Random Shower Thought Hollow Earth - Revisited

This is an after thought on the hollow earth random shower thought of 2020.

In 1969, Nasa launched its second manned mission to the moon: Apollo 12. One of the objectives of this mission was to learn more about what is below the surface. For that purpose the astronauts planted seismometers before their departure back to earth. The idea is that when a known mass impacts the moon, the resulting seismic data can be measured and analyzed to draw conclusions about the moons composition. 

After their departure, the Apollo 12 astronauts intentionally sent their ascent stage module hurtling back into the moon. It impacted the surface and the resulting data was a bit of a surprise. The moon "rang like a bell" for nearly an hour. Which is not expected of a solid body. One of the resulting theories is that the moon might be "hollow"... if the moon might be hollow... what other heavenly bodies might be hollow? 

According to the electric universe theory, only a single force is necessary to explain both magnetism and gravity. 

Where the nucleus in an atom is slightly shifted towards the center of an object, creating a dipole field. Since the electric force is so strong, this distortion would only need to be minute to create a weak force like that of gravity.

As a result in larger bodies of matter we get spherical arrangements with one pole facing out and one facing inwards... and as we know... like poles repel... 

Asteroid Bennu was the target of the Osiris Rex mission in 2020. The spacecraft touched down on its surface and there were many strange discoveries that lead scientists to believe that it is likely hollow. Another source. 

Where ever I look, a common theme seems to be that we tend to be wrong about things... and the one thing required to make progress in any given field is an open mind and the willingness to unlearn a lot of what we thought we knew to be true... which seems to be rare amongst experts (who are the disseminators and gate keepers of information and "knowledge").

Wal Thornhill introduced a new paradigm. A Theory of Everything: The Electric Universe. It correctly predicts and explains discoveries in the space age that baffle astronomers adhering to the gravitational model of the universe. For example, Thornhill specifically predicted the unexpected results of the Deep Impact mission to comet Tempel 1 in October 2001, almost four years before the event. He was alone in successfully predicting what would be seen beneath the clouds of Saturn’s moon Titan... etc.

• Was there a big bang? Why would there have been?
• Is Einstein’s Relativity holding up? Questionable.
• Is the Sun really a thermonuclear fusion reactor which will eventually run out of fuel and burn out? Or is it getting its energy from another source?
• Are there black holes or are our telescopes taking photos of plasmoids?
• What about dark matter and dark energy? They have been theorized to exist because we can not explain what we observe in the cosmos without them using only the gravitational model of the universe. In an electric universe there is no need for them.

​
As William of Ockham said: “With all things being equal, the simplest explanation tends to be the right one.” Out of the theories we currently have the Electric Universe seems to be closest to the truth of reality. 

Questions I want to understand the answer to now are:

• What keeps planets in orbit according to the electric universe theory?
• How do seismologists currently come to the conclusion that the earth is solid?